Wow, I didn't realize that men only use guns to kill women.Oh. Wait. That's not true? Not even remotely true?What's your point?
It sure wasn't that men only use guns to kill women. Although more men use guns against women than to protect them, despite the fantasies of the gun nuts.
Although more men use guns against women than to protect them, despite the fantasies of the gun nuts. That which is asserted without evidence should be summarily disregarded.(Oh, and you completely missed the point. No surprise there.)
I didn't miss my point. Your response had nothing to do with it.
No, you did miss the point, because you don't even understand the question.There are two kinds of boyfriends, murderous and not murderous. And boyfriends also either have guns, or do not have guns.So, the proper question, is Who is most likely to murder you, a murderous boyfriend, or a non-murderous boyfriend?(Pro-tip, Harry, if this question seems to difficult: non-murderous boyfriends don't murder, no matter what weapon they have at their disposal.)
Not actually correct:http://q1065.fm/hollis-woman-was-shot-by-man-who-came-to-her-aid/
Harry, do you have any understanding, at all, what the word "likely" means?
And within what context it must be used? (Clue: if you are providing an anecdote, then the answers are NO and NO.)
This comment has been removed by the author.
Better hope the boyfriend doesn't use one of these:http://www.cnbc.com/2016/11/15/huge-trove-of-remington-rifle-documents-is-made-public-.html?utm_content=bufferccc61&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer
No, you did miss the point, because you don't even understand the question.There are two kinds of boyfriends, murderous and not murderous. And boyfriends also either have guns, or do not have guns. (Added: and hammers, bats, fists, knives, crowbars etc...)So, the proper question, is Who is most likely to murder you, a murderous boyfriend, or a non-murderous boyfriend?Stop it with the misdirection -- how about addressing the glaring category mistake upon which your entire fatuous post rests?
Be sure to let me know next time an angry boyfriend kills a roomful of people with a hammer
So, the proper question, is Who is most likely to murder you, a murderous boyfriend, or a non-murderous boyfriend? Or, perhaps, Why should anyone take you, whose reasoning skills are so corrupted by zealotry, seriously about anything?
Oh, BTW, did you know that Prius drivers have killed more people than angry boyfriends?
No and neither do you.
Oh, I'm sorry, I thought irrelevant, invented facts are just fine here.Just following your example, after all.
Wow, I didn't realize that men only use guns to kill women.
ReplyDeleteOh. Wait. That's not true? Not even remotely true?
What's your point?
It sure wasn't that men only use guns to kill women. Although more men use guns against women than to protect them, despite the fantasies of the gun nuts.
ReplyDeleteAlthough more men use guns against women than to protect them, despite the fantasies of the gun nuts.
ReplyDeleteThat which is asserted without evidence should be summarily disregarded.
(Oh, and you completely missed the point. No surprise there.)
I didn't miss my point. Your response had nothing to do with it.
ReplyDeleteNo, you did miss the point, because you don't even understand the question.
ReplyDeleteThere are two kinds of boyfriends, murderous and not murderous.
And boyfriends also either have guns, or do not have guns.
So, the proper question, is Who is most likely to murder you, a murderous boyfriend, or a non-murderous boyfriend?
(Pro-tip, Harry, if this question seems to difficult: non-murderous boyfriends don't murder, no matter what weapon they have at their disposal.)
Not actually correct:
ReplyDeletehttp://q1065.fm/hollis-woman-was-shot-by-man-who-came-to-her-aid/
Harry, do you have any understanding, at all, what the word "likely" means?
ReplyDeleteAnd within what context it must be used? (Clue: if you are providing an anecdote, then the answers are NO and NO.)
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteBetter hope the boyfriend doesn't use one of these:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.cnbc.com/2016/11/15/huge-trove-of-remington-rifle-documents-is-made-public-.html?utm_content=bufferccc61&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer
No, you did miss the point, because you don't even understand the question.
ReplyDeleteThere are two kinds of boyfriends, murderous and not murderous.
And boyfriends also either have guns, or do not have guns. (Added: and hammers, bats, fists, knives, crowbars etc...)
So, the proper question, is Who is most likely to murder you, a murderous boyfriend, or a non-murderous boyfriend?
Stop it with the misdirection -- how about addressing the glaring category mistake upon which your entire fatuous post rests?
Be sure to let me know next time an angry boyfriend kills a roomful of people with a hammer
ReplyDeleteSo, the proper question, is Who is most likely to murder you, a murderous boyfriend, or a non-murderous boyfriend?
ReplyDeleteOr, perhaps, Why should anyone take you, whose reasoning skills are so corrupted by zealotry, seriously about anything?
Oh, BTW, did you know that Prius drivers have killed more people than angry boyfriends?
ReplyDeleteNo and neither do you.
ReplyDeleteOh, I'm sorry, I thought irrelevant, invented facts are just fine here.
ReplyDeleteJust following your example, after all.