CHANGING MINES IN AMERICA,
by Peter Goin and C. Elizabeth Raymond. 208 pages, illustrated.
Center for American Places
Working mines are
ephemeral. Few stay open more than a few decades, often less. The
changes they make to the landscape can last more or less forever.
It was the thought of
photographer Peter Goin, after nearly being trapped in an abandoned
mine, to examine the meaning of old mines to the human and physical
landscape. Elizabeth Alexander provided the historical background.
They examine four pairs of
mines, some active, and discover that while most people do not
welcome mines as neighbors, once they have them they sometimes object
to environmental restoration.
This is said to be true of
the hard coal area of Pennsylvania's Wyoming Valley, where removal of
spoil heaps was resisted. Removal of mining buildings also raises
objections.
In one sense, this is
understandable. In many remote places, the mining landscape is the
only human landscape around. Goin and Alexander find this to be
particularly true of Eagle Mountain, Calif., where an iron mine
created an ideal '50s small town in the desert, which its residents
bitterly missed when the mine closed.
Alexander does a good job
of assembling the disparate viewpoints, although she perhaps
understates the desperate situation of what the oceanographer Orrin
Pilkey labeled “chalices of poison,” the deadly lakes that result
when pumping ceases in open pit mines in the West.
I had never heard of radon
tourism at several Montana uranium mines, where deluded people spend
weeks underground each year seeking relief from arthritis. But it is
reminiscent of the tuberculosis hospital established in Mammoth Cave
before the Civil War in the belief that absence of sunlight would be
helpful.
Goin's photographs are
purely reportorial; there is no effort to exploit the mines for arty
or picturesque reasons.
Since few people visit
mines, and even fewer have occasion to visit a working mine, this
book, a series in a study of American landscapes, would be a fine
introduction for the excluded masses; but it was published in such a
small edition that it can have hardly any impact.
Good idea, though.
No comments:
Post a Comment