Friday, February 27, 2015

Chickens come home to roost on rightwing creep

And shit all over him.

Be sure to click through to the GoFundMe page and read the comments.


20 comments:

  1. I did.

    The progressive a$$holery is truly astonishing to behold. Being wrong in the particulars and conceptually challenged at the same time is bad enough. But the spewing of progressive hatred is practically beyond belief.

    Nice crowd you hang with.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Wrong in what particulars? As one of the commenters asked, are there no workhouses?

    (He was being sarcastic.)

    ReplyDelete
  3. Wrong in the particular that he didn't set it up (as if that matters). Wrong on the concept, too: it's perfectly wonderful to use the power of government to take money, but donations? HELL NO!

    Speaking of nice crowds: Jezebel completely be-merdes itself, and then issues a cack-handed update. (And hate-filled progs fail to take it on board.)

    ReplyDelete
  4. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I see you missed the point, just like Ron Paul did.

    Curiously enough the progs did not just shrug and say, let him die.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Curiously enough the progs did not just shrug and say, let him die.

    No, just a lot of hate filled rants.

    Remind me again, who said "let him die"?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Teadiots did. Dunno why you need reminding, you have the video.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Teadiots did. Dunno why you need reminding, you have the video.

    Yes, I have the video, which proves you a liar.

    Of course, I could be wrong. It's easy enough to provide a link to the exact time in the video where Tea Party members say "let him die".

    You never have. You never will, either.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I thought I'd wait a bit to see what shook out. This:

    http://www.gunowners.org/sk0802htm.htm

    Still a creep.

    A homicidal, grifting, sociopathic creep. Maye he could get his own day like Kyle.

    Query: when Mack had his emergency that his modest resources were unable to pay for, did he accept personal responsibility and go home and treat his chest pains with Alka-Seltzer; or did he go to a public hospital in a public ambulance and expect treatment without payment? Why is that not considered theft of services?

    ReplyDelete
  10. Of course, I could be wrong. It's easy enough to provide a link to the exact time in the video where Tea Party members say "let him die".

    Start there.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Query: when Mack had his emergency that his modest resources were unable to pay for, did he accept personal responsibility and go home and treat his chest pains with Alka-Seltzer; or did he go to a public hospital in a public ambulance and expect treatment without payment? Why is that not considered theft of services?

    ReplyDelete
  12. ... or did he go to a public hospital in a public ambulance and expect treatment without payment?

    I don't know what actually happened, and you don't either.

    But I do know this: you presented a false dichotomy. That's bad enough -- whether due to ignorance or axe-grinding -- but your false dichotomy doesn't even accidentally include the right option.

    The proof is in your OP.

    Why isn't your response considered a theft of intellectual resources?

    ReplyDelete
  13. Actually I do know. He didn't have insurance and he was treated. Unless it was at a private charity hospital -- not many of those around -- he ripped off the taxpayers.

    Now he says (he's been all over the radio telling his disgusting story) he'll pay it back -- for sure, unless maybe he dies or something.

    I got it right, first time out. Like shooting fish in a barrel really. Which is the party of 'takers.' The Tea Party

    ReplyDelete
  14. Actually I do know. He didn't have insurance and he was treated. Unless it was at a private charity hospital -- not many of those around -- he ripped off the taxpayers.

    Not only do you not know, you are clearly wrong: you have presented a false dichotomy, and have attempted to cover it over by denying, or being ignorant of, any other options.

    But that is par for your course. You don't let your ignorance get in the way of an opportunity to defame someone.

    ReplyDelete
  15. He's said he didn't have insurance. Are you challenging his life experience?

    ReplyDelete
  16. Huh?

    He doesn't rip off the taxpayers unless he doesn't pay his bill. Insurance is one way to do that, but not the only way.

    Unless, and until, the debt becomes uncollectable, he hasn't ripped off the taxpayers.

    That's your false dichotomy.

    ReplyDelete
  17. So his health plan was to hope for manna from heaven?

    Got it.

    ReplyDelete
  18. So his health plan was to hope for manna from heaven?

    No matter. Until he fails to pay his hospital bills, then he hasn't ripped off the taxpayers, making you and your fellow progressives a baying mob. Again.

    ReplyDelete