You know how the gun nuts get all huffy and insulted when RtO calls them gun nuts?Really? Where? A simple exact quote will do.I cannot imagine whySo let me get this straight. Nothing happened. The militia group quickly apologized. And the encounter happened in an area where the sign says: "Caution: Smuggling and illegal Immigration may be encountered in this area." Which means your sainted bat biologists were in far more danger from what they were lucky enough not to have encountered, rather than what they did.Which your sheriff, and that pit of hysterical idiocy, Wonkette, completely failed to mention.I am so not surprised.And This didn't happen.
Read the comments at the original, and still in business, RtO.What do you mean, nothing happened? A gang of armed nitwits kidnapped a group of peaceable citizens. Yes kidnapped. Read the statute.And so what if the biologists had run across smugglers who would have faded into the darkness.Your defense of these maniacs is of a piece with your defense of Zimmerman's stalking black kids. Even if, which is not the case, Americans need to go armed in self-defense, no one in his right mind thinks that delusional wannabes looking for trouble should be allowed to wander our nation heavily armed.
Read the comments at the original, and still in business, RtO. No. How about you actually source your blather.I'm betting you can't, because when challenged you never have.And I'm quite certain that streak will continue unbroken. After all, the last time you were challenged to defend the indefensible, you didn't. And so what if the biologists had run across smugglers who would have faded into the darkness. Really? Your naiveté is truly touching.Your defense of these maniacs is of a piece with your defense of Zimmerman's stalking black kids. My defense is solely of the facts. Yours is whatever it takes -- without a hint of irony -- to fluff the progressive narrative. Martin got shot while trying to beat the cr@p out of Zimmerman. Deal with it.
You demand sources, then refuse to examine them. This is a mirror site; the original site has a different group of commenters.Your naivete regarding delusional gun nuts running around in the dark -- whether Zimmerman or Minutemen -- is frightening.
What's delusional about the Minutemen? Oh, right, of course. Unlike what the sign says, there is plenty of border enforcement in the area, and absolutely no smuggling or illegal immigration.Wait. What?You demand sources, then refuse to examine them. Really, it isn't that hard to put a link in.That way -- since I no longer look at the other version of this that had the most viciously stupid commenting function since the dawn of the webz -- I wouldn't have to wonder what the heck you are talking about.You do have a rather extensive track record of making assertions that collapse under even superficial scrutiny, after all.
And you have an unbroken record of refusing to look when I do put up links. So while I might supply them for other requesters, there is no point with you.What's delusional about the Minutemen? Where to begin? That they are an effective militia, for starters. I don't think we need to go any further.
And you have an unbroken record of refusing to look when I do put up links. You are completely wrong just within this thread: Nothing happened. The militia group quickly apologized. And the encounter happened in an area where the sign says: "Caution: Smuggling and illegal Immigration may be encountered in this area." I'll bet you can't find a single instance when I didn't follow your links.And plenty where you probably wished I hadn't. Did the Tea Partiers chant "Let him die!"?
To what purpose? You then declared, more than once, that you dismissed whatever Wonkette had, although the point of following an aggregator is to see the aggregates.At Wonkette, of course, the links are always (though sometimes in layers) to the original source to be ridiculed. So you can make up your own mind.
To what purpose? You said this: You know how the gun nuts get all huffy and insulted when RtO calls them gun nuts?Fine -- give me links to where gun nuts get all huffy and insulted. You then declared, more than once, that you dismissed whatever Wonkette had, although the point of following an aggregator is to see the aggregates. Because Wonkette is hysterical and ideological. It is where progressives go to fluff their self regard. It is nearly universally devoid of anything like critical, objective, analysis. Prediction: instead of a link to any comments on RtO that are in even the same time zone as any remotely plausible definition of "huffy" or "insulted" you will either memhole your baseless assertion, or prevaricate.Which pretty much amounts to the same thing.
I think I will not link to my own blog, thanks. You know where the comments are; you do not have to deal with the commenting function to read them.
I shouldn't have to plow through your other blog to find which posts have those comments. Moreover, I also shouldn't have to decide which you find "huffy" and "insulted". After all, as has been previously demonstrated, your definitions for some words are, charitably, idiosyncratic. I suspect, and you can easily demonstrate otherwise, is that you are prevaricating. You trotted out a baseless defamatory charge, and when pressed, do everything except provide a straightforward answer.Par for the progressive course. The question is: why?
The reaction to my posts is hardly unusual nor hard to find duplicated elsewhere. The Flock the NRA FB page is a rich source of huffy, insulted and far, far worse reactions from gun nuts.Or, you could just read some of the statements of Wayne LaPierre. The idea that huffy, insulted reactions from gun nuts is inherently unlikely is risible, ain't it?
Your response is a model of prevarication, and completely unsurprising.To translate Harry into English, when you said You know how the gun nuts get all huffy and insulted when RtO calls them gun nuts? , what you really meant was that, in fact, there is no such thing people getting huffy and insulted when RtO called then gun nuts.Just like when you said "Tea Partiers chanted 'Let Him Die'" really meant that Tea Partiers in fact did no such thing.