Thursday, April 4, 2019
No Barr's holding!
At least as regards national security or classified material, Barr's
objections to releasing the report are absurd since the administration of
which he is a high officer allows random dudes on the street to see
secret documents and hands out clearances with the same amount of
vetting that Cracker Jack uses to hand out its prizes.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I believe Cracker Jack is more serious than that.
ReplyDeleteBarr's objections to releasing the report are absurd since the administration of which he is a high officer allows random dudes on the street to see secret documents and hands out clearances with the same amount of vetting that Cracker Jack uses to hand out its prizes.
ReplyDeleteFalse equivalence, and outright lie.
But par for your course.
You were incandescent about Clinton's emails but defend the security management of an administration that not only is the most reckless in history on security but, on the other side, withdraws security clearances from loyal Americans because Trump hates free speech.
ReplyDeleteJust imagine Skipper's reaction if, in a Clinton presidency, Chelsea Clinton were making money out of the Saudis while communicating with them about state matters (including state secrets) by standard email and telephone...
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteIn the fullness of time, Harry is proven yet again a fool, and Clovis blind to Clintonian reality. Along with epic question begging.
ReplyDeleteYour fulminations about Clinton and refusal to condemn the reckless security practices of rump show it was just politics for you -- you care nothing about security.
ReplyDelete[Harry:] Your fulminations about Clinton and refusal to condemn the reckless security practices of rump show it was just politics for you ...
ReplyDeleteYou have absolutely no idea what was going on about those security clearances. But you have never let that slow you down.
As for being a fool, the report was released with few redactions.
Proving that you, and all the MSM, spent more than two years in journalistic flatulence eventually amounting to "never mind".
Just as I predicted two and a half years ago.
[Harry:] Your fulminations about Clinton ...
ReplyDeleteAs for my fulminations about Clinton -- she destroyed more than 30,000 pieces of evidence while under investigation. Yet that is not obstruction of justice.
Yet Trump, who never actually obstructed justice, did.
How many standards of justice are there?
Clovis:
ReplyDeleteHave you succumbed to Harry's inability to link to what the heck you are talking about?