Tuesday, April 1, 2014

Examining Hobby Lobby's entrails

The sanctimonious owners of Hobby Lobby should have expected they would have every last detail of their behavior examined once they decided someone had appointed them the controllers of the personal behavior of their employers. Bingo!
The results have been what we expect from sanctimonious God-botherers: They don't come close to what they claim.

 First it was revealed that they had been buying contraceptives, like Ella, that they said they abhor. No surprise there. When the Catholic bishops made a similar claim they were caught out, too.

 Now it is revealed that they also invested part (most, actually) of the pension money they control into mutual funds that own, among other things, abortion drug manufacturers. I don't take this as seriously as the earlier discovery that they and the bishops had, in fact, done what the government was now requiring them to do without, it appears, being struck down by an angry Jehovah.

It is not easy being a monomaniac in modern society, whether one wants to be a vegan or a religious bigot. We are too interconnected.

But the Mother Jones report offers a couple of factoids that are worthy of note. One is that the pension fund for 13,000 people, evidently around $100 million, is awfully small. The Greens are not required to have one at all, but that works out to less than $8,000 per worker. Sounds like they are counting, one way or another, on big gummint intrusion into their workers' lives at some point. Second is this:
In their Supreme Court complaint, Hobby Lobby's owners chronicle the many ways in which they avoid entanglements with objectionable companies. Hobby Lobby stores do not sell shot glasses, for example, and the Greens decline requests from beer distributors to back-haul beer on Hobby Lobby trucks.
Recall that the Greens claim their objections are based on their sincere religious beliefs as Roman Catholics. Sorry, as an ex-Catholic I can say confidently that there is no Catholic moral objection to beer or to whatever it is that is served in shot glasses. What this amounts to is a sworn admission by the Greens that they do not manage their company according to any religious doctrine but are merely a pair of busybodies and common scolds.

9 comments:

  1. Re-read that MJ article.

    Every charge you make is wrong. Whether through negligence or not is harder to tell.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I have to take back one point. The Greens are not Catholics, they are holy rollers. I was misled by their meeting with the pope. Most Oklahoma holy rollers consider the pope the Antichrist. The Greens must be liberals.

    So now I get to double down on the common scold and busybody claim. Quite possibly they have a sincere religiously based moral belief that beer is evil. These people are crazy.

    ReplyDelete
  3. First it was revealed that they had been buying contraceptives, like Ella, that they said they abhor.

    No, they didn't

    One is that the pension fund for 13,000 people, evidently around $100 million, is awfully small.

    Hobby Lobby does employee matching. The size of the pension fund is dependent upon the employees, not Hobby Lobby.

    It is bad enough that you failed to properly cite the article. Even worse, you completely missed Hobby Lobby's point. (That is, to the extent that not even mentioning the point constitutes missing it.)

    ReplyDelete
  4. Didn't what, abhor?

    So, it's matching. I get that. I get that a Hobby Lobby retiree will enjoy about $1,000 a year pension, and that the Greens appear to be counting on big gummint to keep their retirees from starving.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Point epically missed, as usual.

    BTW, FedEx, regularly cited as one of, if not absolutely, the best companies to work for in the US has the same employee matching as Hobby Lobby.

    ReplyDelete
  6. You know what? People who get paid peanuts are not going to have satisfactory retirement funds. This is something I have never, ever seen the I-got-mine crowd address.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Just to be clear.

    First it was revealed that they had been buying contraceptives ...

    Is completely wrong. How did you manage to goon that up so badly?

    ReplyDelete
  8. You know what? People who get paid peanuts are not going to have satisfactory retirement funds.

    And there go the goal posts, scrambling over the horizon.

    You don't know how much people who work for HL get paid. You made a charge about their retirement plan that is wrong. How about addressing that?

    ReplyDelete
  9. It wasn't wrong (and I do know how much they get paid). And the Greens did buy contraceptives. Those hairs are getting split mighty fine.

    Since I set the goalposts in my first comment about the pension fund, the goalposts have not moved. You could read what I said.

    Although there are people out there who are more alarmist than even I am about the safety and adequacy of private pensions:

    http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2014/04/12/thought-secure-pooled-pensions-teeter-and-fall/?_php=true&_type=blogs&hp&_r=0

    ReplyDelete